Web 2.0 was also supposed to USA Phone Number List become a lot more democratic, but has not (or barely) lived up to that. Why would that work with Web3? Jack Dorsey tweets skeptically that the people trying to market Web3 were also getting filthy rich from Web 2.0. Accept cookies Ernst-Jan Pfauth, meanwhile, has doubts USA Phone Number List in the NRC : “Moreover, there are many libertarians among them, who USA Phone Number List hope that Web3 will decentralize everything so that we no longer need governments. Not to mention the environmental impact of some blockchains.” José van Dijck states in De Groene Amsterdammer that Web3 gets stuck ideologically
On the assumption that your USA Phone Number List data may be tradable. You will get money and participation in return, but you will still sell your data. With the risk that you still have no idea what your data is used for. Van USA Phone Number List Dijck wants to be able to add value to the internet, but not just commercial value. Also read: USA Phone Number List Picture perfect SEO: 8 tips for optimizing images What then? So what USA Phone Number List could an open, decentralized internet look like? For this article I will limit myself to a few examples of social media. But of course it goes further than that. You can also think of open alternatives for software and even smartphones.
PubHubs José van Dijck is USA Phone Number List working with Bart Jacobs (professor at Radboud University) on a social media alternative: PubHubs . In this network you are in various hubs (such as family, municipality, library USA Phone Number List and sports club). In each hub, only a relevant part of your own identity plays a role. The concept reminds me of the defunct Google+, where you also had several "circles". PubHubs USA Phone Number List is still under development and should be ready within five years (quite a long time by internet terms). It is part of the coalition of public organizations called PublicSpaces . Element & Matrix Meanwhile,